CPSY 501 Fall 2010 HW Assignment #2:
Multiple Regression

Total: 20 marks. Due: Fri 29 Oct 09:00am, uploaded to myCourses

Dataset

Please download from the course website (under "assignments") and use the HW2-Klassen_SWB.sav dataset for this assignment. This dataset is from Derrick Klassen's thesis on spiritual well-being of university students. The data are from self-reports of 160 people at TWU (mostly undergraduate students, but also some graduate students).

The outcome variable is spiritual well-being (SWB). Various predictor variables include

Based on existing theory of psychology of religion, the predictors can be grouped into 3 blocks: (1) Quest, (2) Personal Meaning, and (3) both developmental (Moratorium) variables. You will need to run hierarchical regression tests in SPSS to answer the following questions.

Questions

  1. Outliers (2 marks)

    Identify the variable(s) with potential univariate outliers, and for each of those variables report which cases have potentially outlying values.
  2. Parametricity (3 marks)

    Does the outcome variable (Spiritual Well Being, SWB) appear to meet the assumptions of parametricity? Identify each assumption, and describe how you checked for each assumption.

    In a real study, you would remove the outliers and make changes to accommodate for violations of parametricity. For purposes of this assignment, however, do not alter the dataset -- for the rest of this assignment, you may assume that the data meet the assumptions for regression.

  3. Total Effect of Model (1 mark)

    In a broader population of young adults in university, what percentage of the total variance in SWB can be accounted for by Quest, Personal Meaning, and Moratorium Status?
  4. Direction of Quest Effect (2 marks)

    Identify the direction of the relationship between Quest and SWB. Is it Explain how you reached your conclusion and report the appropriate numbers to support your answer.
  5. Unique Effect of Moratorium (1 marks)

    How much extra variation in participants’ SWB levels did the developmental variables explain, over and above the effects of Quest and Personal Meaning?
  6. Marcia's Developmental Model (3 marks)

    In the developmental theories of Marcia, a process of moratorium is often a distressing period in life that can nevertheless be helpful over the longer term in the process of identity development. Describe ways that this analysis fits and/or does not fit with that model.
  7. Quest vs. Moratorium (3 marks)

    Briefly compare the strength of the zero-order effect and the unique effect of the Quest orientation in explaining Spiritual Well-Being. Is the unique Quest effect stronger or weaker than the Moratorium Status effect?
  8. Overly Influential Cases (3 marks)

    Assess this data set for any potentially “overly influential” cases. (Do not remove outliers before you conduct your assessment- doing so may change the data set and, consequently, mess up your response to this question.) (See textbook and notes for lecture 05.) In a short paragraph, identify the criteria that you used for determining whether you have an overly influential case. Identify the case number of the participant with the highest leverage value.

APA Style (2 marks)

Format your answers in a single document (Word .doc or similar), clearly formatted and written in complete sentences. From this assignment and onward, you are required to use proper APA manuscript style! Include relevant figures within your document, following APA style for figures.

Also create a clean SPSS output file (.spv) showing the relevant analyses and plots. Make sure your SPSS output file doesn't have any output from any other "trial runs" you did! It is possible to edit an output file to delete extraneous output.

Turn-in

You should upload to myCourses the following: