See the template lab write-up for additional details. The write-up must include (in this order):
print out informative headings and greeting to the user compute _____ using (insert formula from first refinement) obtain the density of the material from the user assign the initial value 3 to the rate of decomposition for each element of the array, do the following: statement statement while the value of the month is more than June do statement statement repeat the following steps: statement statement until (some condition is met)
| Planning: | |
|---|---|
| Problem Statement, restatement, and first refinement | 5 |
| Pseudocode, algorithms, etc. (as needed) | 5 |
| Data table and Sample I/O | 5 |
| User documentation, error planning | 5 |
| Implementation | |
| Docstring, general appearance, prettyprinting, etc. | 5 |
| Internal documentation, comments, identifier names | 5 |
| Programming style (modularity, modifiability, etc.) | 5 |
| Production: | |
| Correctness of outcome and thoroughness of testing | 10 |
| Screenshots of actual runs (with input data as appropriate) | 5 |
| TOTAL: | 50 |
| Design | 10 |
|---|---|
| Who are you? | |
| Statement of problem | |
| Discussion of strategy | |
| Code | 30 |
| Docstring with identifying header | |
| Well-commented and well-formatted code | |
| Screenshots of sample runs | 10 |
| TOTAL: | 50 |
| 45 - 50 | Excellent. Everything complete, explanations and all
planning evidence and documentation clear AND IN PROPER ENGLISH, efficient and readable (prettyprinted) code. |
|---|---|
| 35 - 44 | Good. Some things overlooked, but reasonable explanations. |
| 27 - 34 | Just satisfactory. Some important omissions or errors in the submitted package. |
| < 27 | Unsatisfactory |